Digital Markets

Digital markets pose fundamental challenges for the private enforcement of antitrust, regulatory and consumer protection rules that protect consumers, firms and workers from anti-competitive behaviour and corporate misconduct. These markets often feature platform-based business models, multi-sided markets, direct and indirect network effects, economies of scale and scope and intricate eco-systems which render competition issues more complex and which create scope for exclusionary and exploitative practices. In addition, while digital technologies can sometimes helpfully disrupt concentrated uncompetitive markets, they can also create new opportunities to collude, to exploit and to discriminate.

As the impact of the digital sector extends beyond information goods and services into other areas of the economy, civil society groups, firms across the economy, and policymakers are increasingly being forced into action to defend the rights of consumers and firms to participate in fair, open and competitive markets. Fideres is one of the leading economic consultancies working to address misconduct in digital markets through research and litigation. Through our investigative work, we identify evidence of violations of competition law, regulatory rules and consumer protection laws across the jurisdictions in which we operate. We assist law firms and regulators throughout the life of the litigation, from filing to settlement.

For any Digital Markets related enquiries please contact Chris Pike at [email protected]

Team

CHRIS PIKE

Head of Digital Markets
Managing Director
London

DATO ARONIA

Economic Consultant
Associate
London

CHRIS RIEVE

Economic Consultant
Senior Associate
London

LUDOVICA PARADISI

Economic Consultant
Associate
London

Experts

PROF. YANNIS KATSOULACOS

Affiliate Academic Expert
London

PROF. LUIS CABRAL

Affiliate Academic Expert
New York

Services

Original Investigations

  • Self-preferencing
  • Exclusive and quasi-exclusive dealing
  • Loyalty discounts
  • Tying and Bundling
  • Margin squeeze
  • Refusal to deal
  • Forced free-riding & content scraping
  • Privacy policy tying
  • Platform envelopment
  • Drip-pricing and other behavioural manipulation
  • Excessive prices or data collection
  • Algorithmic discrimination and personalised pricing
  • Coordinated pricing & price guarantees
  • Online sales bans & minimum internet advertised prices
  • Hub and spoke cartels
  • Algorithmic collusio

Creative Problem Solution

  • Impact on prices of Most Favoured Nation (MFN) / Price Parity clauses
  • Market definition
  • Quantification of network effects
  • Rule of reason tests
  • Equally efficient competitor test, vertical arithmetic test

High Quality Expert Work

  • Expert reports
  • Expert witness testimony
  • Merits reports
  • Plan of allocation and settlement distribution
  • Damages analysis
  • Data analysis

Track record

Fideres has been at the forefront of investigations into cryptocurrency price manipulation and alleged misconduct by crypto exchanges. We have been advising our clients on a number of court and arbitration disputes. We collaborate with academics and our affiliate academic experts in this fast developing area of finance. Sample cases include:

  • Arbitration dispute, England – expert appointment to advise on a dispute related to the unwinding of a cryptocurrency loan transaction
  • Cryptocurrency price manipulation class action, US – pre-filing economic analysis to identify evidence of price manipulation and damages modelling, 2:19-cv-01902 and 1:19-cv-09236

Fideres has a wealth of experience in analysing competition within digital markets and emerging technologies such as blockchain. From defining markets for multi-sided platforms, to exploring anti-competitive conduct by large firms that benefit from strong network effects and large economies of scale and scope and who set zero prices and extract data. This experience is helping us to investigate and develop cases, and to provide expert testimony to courts and expert advice to clients working on complaints against many of the biggest monopolists in the sector. Sample cases include:

  • Apple appstore market monopolization antitrust class action, US – pre-filing economic analysis, 4:19-cv-03074-YGR
  • Facebook CAT class action, England – member of board of advisors to the lead claimant, 1433/7/7/22

Research

Filter

Research

The Price of Knowledge

April 28, 2022
Fideres Investigates Competition Issues In Academic Journal Markets
Research

The Antitrust Case Against The Loyalty Penalty

September 24, 2021
Defining Markets For Loyal Customers
Research

An Epic Judgement

August 16, 2021
Economic Review Of The Epic V Apple Landmark Case
Research

Pre-Arranged Bids On Prepaid Cards

April 12, 2021
Assessing The Impact Of The Cartel Allegations
Research

Putting A Price On Consumer Data

March 3, 2020
Damage Estimation In Data Breach Litigation
Research

British Airways’ Data Breach

July 15, 2019
As GDPR Takes Off, UK Litigators May Become Frequent Filers
Research

Robot Cartels

March 18, 2016
Algorithmic Price Fixing May Be The New Frontier Of Anti-Trust.
Dan BrockettPartner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

“Fideres provided us with innovative quantitative analysis that was critical for building this CDS anti-trust case against major dealers. In addition to... [quantifying] the amount of damages, they clearly briefed me and my team on the technical aspects of the CDS market.“

Jeremy LiebermanManaging Partner, Pomerantz LLP

“Fideres have provided our firm with input on various aspects of 10b5 claims, including class-wide damages and market efficiency assessments. They are responsive and their reports clear and to the point.”

Bill SchervishDirector, Labaton Sucharow

“I have engaged Fideres on several securities fraud cases. They have provided our firm with prompt and precise event studies, even in non-standard cases that required innovative approaches.”

Philip YoungPartner, Cooke, Young & Keidan LLP

“Fideres combines top class financial knowledge with a creative approach in order to provide innovative insights into LIBOR.... They have thoroughly researched and are leading experts on the technical aspects of LIBOR and are professional, reliable and a pleasure to work with.”

Michael EisenkraftPartner, Cohen Milstein Sellers and Toll PLLC

“Over the years I have worked closely with Fideres’s research team to investigate new antitrust matters. Their novel investigative approach has led us to work together on several new potential cartel cases and assess their viability at an early stage.”

Michael SternhellDirector, Burford Capital LLC

"We have worked with Fideres on several complex securities matters. They have assisted with damages modeling and estimation at the client-outreach stage through to claims filing, in mediation and during the settlement process. Fideres has extensive experience in damage quantification across security types and is a very reliable partner to work with.”

John DayDirector, DaySparkes Ltd

“We have worked with Fideres in relation to several interest rate misselling matters. Their consultants provided us with effective guidance on a variety of aspects, ranging from the valuation of financial instruments, to the bank’s conduct in relation to the... pricing of such instruments.”

Sharif ShivjiBarrister, 4 Stone Buildings

“I have always found Fideres to be excellent experts. Their work is thoughtful, accurate and displays their valuable real world market experience. They understand the role of an expert in litigation well.”

Laura PosnerPartner, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC

“Fideres has consistently produced event studies reports within 24-hours of the request. The speed of the turnaround time has been impressive. They have provided useful insights and charts to explain complex concepts involved in securities litigation filings.”

David KovelPartner, Kirby McInerney LLC

“We have used Fideres’s expertise in several commodity market and benchmark manipulation cases. Their knowledge of the financial sector, in particular, has been... valuable to the development and success of the matters we have engaged them on.”